Unfortunately the mainstream medical system has been completely unable to investigate or explain what is going on with my body, but anecdotally, the theory that there is a two way street between gut bacteria and the brain completely aligns with my experience.
I'm feeling better now, though my stomach still feels sensitive and I can no longer tolerate gluten.
Something is going on with the brain and my gut.
It's possible that it's endorphins being released to stop any pain ... but this is about 24 hours before the crippling cramps start, and it's more a mood shift than pain killing. Before this great 24 hour, I'm normal baseline okay state.
Today's world of commercialized food (a few major foods/culprits in particular) throws inflammation at us in spades, and eating well has honestly made a huge difference in my life -- the most noticeable parts by far being cognition, energy, and mood. Every time I deviate from clean cooking and eating mainly whole foods, it's painfully obvious since my microbiome loves the new, healthier norm.
I would highly recommend this podcast (neuroscientist Andrew Huberman) if anyone wants to learn more about improving their gut health and the science and research that we know so far. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=15R2pMqU2ok&t=4500s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2mG7DbMQ_gM
Censor, downvote and otherwise dismiss without any intellectual pursuit. If that's what you did then it's an identity for you and evidence to the contrary won't matter.
If we are discussing gut/brain connection in one way why not in others?
[0] https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/49088685-this-is-your-br...
There was an experiment in mice that showed some mice devoid of any gut bacteria had better bone density than the other experiment group.
This is interesting and might suggest some bacteria can cause bone issues.
There is a nervous system in the digestive system that is connected to the brain.
Therefore it is possible for a bacteria to evolve to influence the brain.
If it was possible for a bacteria to evolve to control their host then they would do so.
Therefore, they have done so.
For me it's a common knowledge and I use it quite often.
https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/wellness-and-preventi...
This is, in fact, old hat
A Multidisciplinary Hypothesis about Serotonergic Psychedelics. Is it Possible that a Portion of Brain Serotonin Comes From the Gut? https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36137971/
Seeking the Psilocybiome: Psychedelics meet the microbiota-gut-brain axis https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S169726002...
Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors and the Gut Microbiome: Significance of the Gut Microbiome in Relation to Mechanism of Action, Treatment Response, Side Effects, and Tachyphylaxis https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.6828...
I'll never think of my gut bacteria in the same way again.
Since we do not know much about how the brain works to begin with I guess that is as close as we can get.
I say we dont know much about how the brain works as a I take medication for depression.
The way that works most often is that you are given a pill that may work. You take it for between 2 - 26 weeks, depending on results. (some may have a fast negative effect) and then you tell your doc if you feel better. (Sometimes complicated surveys)
if it didn't work, you get to do it over again. and again and again. until you find something that works, give up or die.
then sometimes it stops working.
One place I know does a cool, I forget the proper name. They take a "video" of how your brain is "working" (at an extremely low resolution). then they compare what they find to knowledge about what parts of the brain should be active, not active etc. From this they hope to establish a delta between "normal" and you.
Then you get to take pills and you come back (after some times) they do the whole thing over again, to see if you are now closer to "normal" or not.
The goal then being to find a chemical that brings you as close to normal as can be.
It is highly appealing in that it would offer -some- scientific basis for evaluating the drugs aside from "How do you feel".
If it -actually works- I have no idea. It was far too expensive for me, and to qualify you have to not have taken any medication already. (that would mess up the "virgin" recording).
An interesting research project would be recording tens of thousands of people who self-reported no depression in the hope that some would develop clinical depression and comparisons could be made.
If we now mix in gut bacteria into the equation, I can imagine you somehow "insert" new gut bacteria into a person and then you wait for some time and tell the doc if it worked or not. If not you can get a different psychobiotics and enter the loop. Add in regular medication for depression the number of possible permutation would become huge.
(I like to include this link to a Standford lecture on the difference between "being sad" and clinical depression https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NOAgplgTxfc)